Friday, August 19, 2005
Indian Media Boom Continues Unabated
Cui Bono: Who Benefits from the Media Explosion in India?
As the article from Indiantelevision.com (below) suggests, television and print media initiatives are on a steeply rising curve in the country, especially with FDI regulation laws in print media being relaxed recently. Fierce competition has already begun, mostly in Mumbai and the south for the print media (see earlier blog posts) and nationally for the upcoming 24-hour news channels.
As is usually the case in free-market capitalism, one would logically expect the consumer to benefit as a consequence of cut-throat competiton. However it is not clear that this outcome will be attained, given that price wars abound as newspapers resort to 'raddi economics' to show artificially boosted circulation figures (again, refer to older posts).
As Sardesai (below) and indeed many before him have argued, the survivors of this internecine media war will be determined by media houses' ability to differentiate themselves from the competition. And, as I have suggested before, for newspapers such as The Hindu, which have built up a century-old reputation for credibility and seriousness, the means to differentiation might be in the realm of news analysis and localisation. Having said that, this is also a time of expansion in the industry, and no institutional player can therefore afford to limit its geographic spread and regional ambitions.
In this context one does wonder what strategy, if any, The Hindu is contemplating, as it watches its competitors making bold forays into the FDI domain and facing each other head on in different theatres of war.
Article from Indantelevision.com
MUMBAI: News is here to stay and the market still has the capacity to absorb new entrants in a sector that has been witnessing explosive growth - and that applies to both print and television. That was the pivotal point that came through at the special interactive panel discussion held in Mumbai yesterday by CNBC TV-18 in association with DNA .
The panel comprised Tam India CEO LV Krishnan, DNA editor-in-chief Gautam Adhikari, Broadcast News editor-in-chief Rajdeep Sardesai, Star News CEO Uday Shankar and MindShare South Asia CEO Vikram Sakhuja.
Moderated by CNBC TV-18 anchor Anuradha Sengupta, the panel discussion titled - 'News v/s News: Will Indian consumers get the best of both worlds?' - had a certain amount of chutzpah and commanded the audiences' rapt attention.
The debate covered the manifold changes that had taken place over the media scenario in India over the last few months. A stark reality today is that with 16 news channels and 55,780 newspapers, Indians are flooded with information like never before. Gone are the days of the daily 9 pm news bulletin on pubcaster Doordarshan. The 24x7 news factor has set in the country and competition is hotting up.
With the plethora of new players entering the media market and a vigorous marketing blitz (as seen in the case of DNA) announcing the new arrivals, the media scene has built up expectations of the reader and viewers to a great extent.
But the fact of the matter remains that the market has not yet reached its saturation point. DNA's Adhikari said that it would take at least another 10 to 15 years for the television news space in the country to cross the saturation point.
Shankar, on the other hand said, "There are close to 30+ applications for news channels uplinking permission pending with the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) ministry today. Yet the time has not come for a flooding in the news channels' space. It's just a trickle. Three years ago Aaj Tak, Zee News and Star News were there in the market. At that time, the top two headlines on the channels were more or less same, but that's where the similarity ended. Channels today have to position themselves more aggressively to survive in this industry."
Shankar also stressed on the fact that the regional space was one to look out for. Speaking about the recently launched Star Ananda's success story, Shankar said, "We were market leaders in the Bengali news channels space in the first month itself. The audience was created overnight and we saw them lapping it up. There was this need gap that needed to be serviced and the demand was met by Star Ananda." He also stressed on the fact that viewers didn't want more news channels but wanted the kind of news that they were interested in.
Adhikari said that the Indian economy was at an infant stage of growth. "The Indian economy is growing at the rate of seven per cent and at that rate, it can take in a lot of new activity and that includes newspapers. We are in the initial stage of development and there has been a spurt in not just in newspapers but media activities. The market in Mumbai has changed and I feel that there is space for two or three more newspapers here. The only thing that will make the newspapers different from each other is competition itself."
Talking about the much hyped and expensive marketing campaign of DNA and pondering over the question whether the paper would be able to live up to the hype, Adhikari said, "DNA is a fresh newspaper, which looks different and is more in-tune with citizens' concerns. We are not trying to live up to the hype of our media campaign but to satisfy the curiosity, need and demand of the reader in a place where the demographics are very interesting."
The number crunching Krishnan began by saying that today the news channels in the country had an overall viewership of seven per cent. "India is one of the largest free news markets in the world with a whole lot of news channels and newspapers. The fact is that 45 per cent of homes in India read the newspaper and 50 per cent of individuals are able to get a cable connection. Hence there is a lot of scope and untapped market. Also there has been a good amount of growth in the advertising spends on news channels. In 2002, there were about 1700 brands advertising, today there are more than 2500 brands advertising on news channels," he said.
Talking about the fight between newspapers and news channels regarding breaking news first, he said that the fight is only a portrayed one and that they actually work in tandem. "When Sonia Gandhi resigned, 85 per cent of people who saw the headline in the newspaper that day spent an hour watching television news channels. On normal days, they don't spend more than 15 minutes on news channels on an average," he said.
He also pointed out that a good time to launch a news channel in a particular place was just before elections. He cited examples of Star Ananda launching just before the municipal elections in Kolkatta and TV9 launching in Andhra Pradesh prior to the assembly elections. Both channels were launched at the opportune time and were doing well, Krishnan said.
Speaking on the race among news channels to 'break news first', Krishnan said, "It's not important to break news first. It is important to cover the news well. The advantage lies with the channel that gives the event the best coverage."
Sakhuja brought in a marketers' perspective to the discussion. "Three years ago the amount spent on news channels in terms of advertising was Rs 4.5 billion. Last year the figure was Rs 7.5 billion and by the end of this year it is likely to reach Rs 8.5 billion. The print medium is also seeing an increase as the number of new markets and editions are coming up. But there is still scope for more. Both newspapers and news channels are growing well and print is acting as a catalyst to news channels. There is a constant need in people to be informed and hence new products will be lapped up well. The drivers in the news channels space will however, be the regional markets and the new advertisers will be seen on national channels such as retail houses, educational institutions and real estate sector."
He further added that while English news channels garner only 10 per cent of the total eyeballs, they grab a disproportionate one-third of the revenue. As far as the Hindi news channels were concerned, Sakhuja said that each of them did have a personality differentiating factor but stressed on sensationalism of news more than anything else.
Sakhuja concluded by saying, "The bottomline is that we are backing this bull-run but anyone who wants to enter this space better have a good proposition. The market place couldn't get better so people should get their thinking caps on."
The last speaker of the day, Sardesai, who is readying for the launch of his new news channel in collaboration with CNBC TV-18, started by saying that he was not going to hype the launch of his channel by a marketing blitz anywhere similar to that of DNA. "I would rather let our brand speak for itself. The consumer today is satisfied in terms of the quantity of news channels in the country but not in terms of the quality of content on these news channels," he said.
Speaking about NDTV's foray into the news segment in 1994-95 with a half hour news based programme on DD, Sardesai said that the industry had moved forward since then to a market where there were a number of players. "A private company started the revolution then by breaking the government's monopoly on news. Today the first phase of that revolution is coming to an end," he said.
Throwing light on the difference between Hindi and English news, he said, "Hindi news brought robustness, which English news lacked. It's time to marry the two. The time has come to get your hands dirty because people don't want journalists reporting from air when there are floods. They want them to be on the ground with them facing the reality. Specialisation is going to be the way forward by exploring new boundaries and hence bringing in new viewers."
Concurring with Adhikari, Sardesai too stressed on the fact that competition was always good in the space. "There is nothing like competition, which will give the Indian viewer what he wants - choice, expertise, involvement and exploring areas that affect him ('glocalisation' of news).
Another way forward for the news channels will be in providing alternate platforms of news like Internet and mobile telephony. There is an enormous opportunity out there, which is waiting to be tapped."
While the industry at large still ponders over the overkill of news channels in the country (add to that the impending launch of the Times Now and Broadcast News channels this year)and newspapers in Mumbai; the verdict among the experts on the panel was clearly that there is still room for more.
As the article from Indiantelevision.com (below) suggests, television and print media initiatives are on a steeply rising curve in the country, especially with FDI regulation laws in print media being relaxed recently. Fierce competition has already begun, mostly in Mumbai and the south for the print media (see earlier blog posts) and nationally for the upcoming 24-hour news channels.
As is usually the case in free-market capitalism, one would logically expect the consumer to benefit as a consequence of cut-throat competiton. However it is not clear that this outcome will be attained, given that price wars abound as newspapers resort to 'raddi economics' to show artificially boosted circulation figures (again, refer to older posts).
As Sardesai (below) and indeed many before him have argued, the survivors of this internecine media war will be determined by media houses' ability to differentiate themselves from the competition. And, as I have suggested before, for newspapers such as The Hindu, which have built up a century-old reputation for credibility and seriousness, the means to differentiation might be in the realm of news analysis and localisation. Having said that, this is also a time of expansion in the industry, and no institutional player can therefore afford to limit its geographic spread and regional ambitions.
In this context one does wonder what strategy, if any, The Hindu is contemplating, as it watches its competitors making bold forays into the FDI domain and facing each other head on in different theatres of war.
Article from Indantelevision.com
MUMBAI: News is here to stay and the market still has the capacity to absorb new entrants in a sector that has been witnessing explosive growth - and that applies to both print and television. That was the pivotal point that came through at the special interactive panel discussion held in Mumbai yesterday by CNBC TV-18 in association with DNA .
The panel comprised Tam India CEO LV Krishnan, DNA editor-in-chief Gautam Adhikari, Broadcast News editor-in-chief Rajdeep Sardesai, Star News CEO Uday Shankar and MindShare South Asia CEO Vikram Sakhuja.
Moderated by CNBC TV-18 anchor Anuradha Sengupta, the panel discussion titled - 'News v/s News: Will Indian consumers get the best of both worlds?' - had a certain amount of chutzpah and commanded the audiences' rapt attention.
The debate covered the manifold changes that had taken place over the media scenario in India over the last few months. A stark reality today is that with 16 news channels and 55,780 newspapers, Indians are flooded with information like never before. Gone are the days of the daily 9 pm news bulletin on pubcaster Doordarshan. The 24x7 news factor has set in the country and competition is hotting up.
With the plethora of new players entering the media market and a vigorous marketing blitz (as seen in the case of DNA) announcing the new arrivals, the media scene has built up expectations of the reader and viewers to a great extent.
But the fact of the matter remains that the market has not yet reached its saturation point. DNA's Adhikari said that it would take at least another 10 to 15 years for the television news space in the country to cross the saturation point.
Shankar, on the other hand said, "There are close to 30+ applications for news channels uplinking permission pending with the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) ministry today. Yet the time has not come for a flooding in the news channels' space. It's just a trickle. Three years ago Aaj Tak, Zee News and Star News were there in the market. At that time, the top two headlines on the channels were more or less same, but that's where the similarity ended. Channels today have to position themselves more aggressively to survive in this industry."
Shankar also stressed on the fact that the regional space was one to look out for. Speaking about the recently launched Star Ananda's success story, Shankar said, "We were market leaders in the Bengali news channels space in the first month itself. The audience was created overnight and we saw them lapping it up. There was this need gap that needed to be serviced and the demand was met by Star Ananda." He also stressed on the fact that viewers didn't want more news channels but wanted the kind of news that they were interested in.
Adhikari said that the Indian economy was at an infant stage of growth. "The Indian economy is growing at the rate of seven per cent and at that rate, it can take in a lot of new activity and that includes newspapers. We are in the initial stage of development and there has been a spurt in not just in newspapers but media activities. The market in Mumbai has changed and I feel that there is space for two or three more newspapers here. The only thing that will make the newspapers different from each other is competition itself."
Talking about the much hyped and expensive marketing campaign of DNA and pondering over the question whether the paper would be able to live up to the hype, Adhikari said, "DNA is a fresh newspaper, which looks different and is more in-tune with citizens' concerns. We are not trying to live up to the hype of our media campaign but to satisfy the curiosity, need and demand of the reader in a place where the demographics are very interesting."
The number crunching Krishnan began by saying that today the news channels in the country had an overall viewership of seven per cent. "India is one of the largest free news markets in the world with a whole lot of news channels and newspapers. The fact is that 45 per cent of homes in India read the newspaper and 50 per cent of individuals are able to get a cable connection. Hence there is a lot of scope and untapped market. Also there has been a good amount of growth in the advertising spends on news channels. In 2002, there were about 1700 brands advertising, today there are more than 2500 brands advertising on news channels," he said.
Talking about the fight between newspapers and news channels regarding breaking news first, he said that the fight is only a portrayed one and that they actually work in tandem. "When Sonia Gandhi resigned, 85 per cent of people who saw the headline in the newspaper that day spent an hour watching television news channels. On normal days, they don't spend more than 15 minutes on news channels on an average," he said.
He also pointed out that a good time to launch a news channel in a particular place was just before elections. He cited examples of Star Ananda launching just before the municipal elections in Kolkatta and TV9 launching in Andhra Pradesh prior to the assembly elections. Both channels were launched at the opportune time and were doing well, Krishnan said.
Speaking on the race among news channels to 'break news first', Krishnan said, "It's not important to break news first. It is important to cover the news well. The advantage lies with the channel that gives the event the best coverage."
Sakhuja brought in a marketers' perspective to the discussion. "Three years ago the amount spent on news channels in terms of advertising was Rs 4.5 billion. Last year the figure was Rs 7.5 billion and by the end of this year it is likely to reach Rs 8.5 billion. The print medium is also seeing an increase as the number of new markets and editions are coming up. But there is still scope for more. Both newspapers and news channels are growing well and print is acting as a catalyst to news channels. There is a constant need in people to be informed and hence new products will be lapped up well. The drivers in the news channels space will however, be the regional markets and the new advertisers will be seen on national channels such as retail houses, educational institutions and real estate sector."
He further added that while English news channels garner only 10 per cent of the total eyeballs, they grab a disproportionate one-third of the revenue. As far as the Hindi news channels were concerned, Sakhuja said that each of them did have a personality differentiating factor but stressed on sensationalism of news more than anything else.
Sakhuja concluded by saying, "The bottomline is that we are backing this bull-run but anyone who wants to enter this space better have a good proposition. The market place couldn't get better so people should get their thinking caps on."
The last speaker of the day, Sardesai, who is readying for the launch of his new news channel in collaboration with CNBC TV-18, started by saying that he was not going to hype the launch of his channel by a marketing blitz anywhere similar to that of DNA. "I would rather let our brand speak for itself. The consumer today is satisfied in terms of the quantity of news channels in the country but not in terms of the quality of content on these news channels," he said.
Speaking about NDTV's foray into the news segment in 1994-95 with a half hour news based programme on DD, Sardesai said that the industry had moved forward since then to a market where there were a number of players. "A private company started the revolution then by breaking the government's monopoly on news. Today the first phase of that revolution is coming to an end," he said.
Throwing light on the difference between Hindi and English news, he said, "Hindi news brought robustness, which English news lacked. It's time to marry the two. The time has come to get your hands dirty because people don't want journalists reporting from air when there are floods. They want them to be on the ground with them facing the reality. Specialisation is going to be the way forward by exploring new boundaries and hence bringing in new viewers."
Concurring with Adhikari, Sardesai too stressed on the fact that competition was always good in the space. "There is nothing like competition, which will give the Indian viewer what he wants - choice, expertise, involvement and exploring areas that affect him ('glocalisation' of news).
Another way forward for the news channels will be in providing alternate platforms of news like Internet and mobile telephony. There is an enormous opportunity out there, which is waiting to be tapped."
While the industry at large still ponders over the overkill of news channels in the country (add to that the impending launch of the Times Now and Broadcast News channels this year)and newspapers in Mumbai; the verdict among the experts on the panel was clearly that there is still room for more.
# posted by Narayan Lakshman @ 2:09 AM 
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
