Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Goldman Sachs rakes in $3 billion in quarterly profits
From The Hindu
Investment bank Goldman Sachs on Tuesday announced profit of $3.46 billion for the first quarter (January-March) of 2010, even as it faced a double embarrassment of the U.K. market regulator joining the United States' Securities and Exchange Commission in announcing fraud investigations into the firm's activities.
Goldman Sach's first quarter performance came on the back of net revenues of $12.78 billion with an annualised return on equity of 20.1 per cent for the quarter. The bottom line was boosted by especially strong performance in the bank's fixed income, commodities and currency division, which generated quarterly net revenues of $7.39 billion.
While Goldman noted that compensation and benefits — including bonuses — to its staff had dropped to 43 per cent of net revenues for the quarter, down from 50 per cent a year ago, it still left its staff with a combined pay package of $5.49 billion, or about $169,000 on an average per employee.
The firm's stellar performance, in the face of continuing economic woes in the U.S., came shortly after the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority announced that “Following preliminary investigations the FSA has decided to commence a formal enforcement investigation into Goldman Sachs International in relation to recent SEC allegations.”
The regulator added that it would be liaising closely with the SEC in this review.
Last week the SEC announced that it had charged Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, for “defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages,” even as the U.S. housing market began to collapse.
The regulator had alleged that when Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralised debt obligation (CDO) whose value was based on the performance of subprime security it did not disclose to investors the fact that Paulson and Company — a major hedge fund that had bet against CDO — played a key role in the decision to include that CDO in investors' portfolios.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs on Tuesday announced profit of $3.46 billion for the first quarter (January-March) of 2010, even as it faced a double embarrassment of the U.K. market regulator joining the United States' Securities and Exchange Commission in announcing fraud investigations into the firm's activities.
Goldman Sach's first quarter performance came on the back of net revenues of $12.78 billion with an annualised return on equity of 20.1 per cent for the quarter. The bottom line was boosted by especially strong performance in the bank's fixed income, commodities and currency division, which generated quarterly net revenues of $7.39 billion.
While Goldman noted that compensation and benefits — including bonuses — to its staff had dropped to 43 per cent of net revenues for the quarter, down from 50 per cent a year ago, it still left its staff with a combined pay package of $5.49 billion, or about $169,000 on an average per employee.
The firm's stellar performance, in the face of continuing economic woes in the U.S., came shortly after the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority announced that “Following preliminary investigations the FSA has decided to commence a formal enforcement investigation into Goldman Sachs International in relation to recent SEC allegations.”
The regulator added that it would be liaising closely with the SEC in this review.
Last week the SEC announced that it had charged Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, for “defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages,” even as the U.S. housing market began to collapse.
The regulator had alleged that when Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralised debt obligation (CDO) whose value was based on the performance of subprime security it did not disclose to investors the fact that Paulson and Company — a major hedge fund that had bet against CDO — played a key role in the decision to include that CDO in investors' portfolios.
Labels: CDO, fraud, Goldman Sachs, RMBS, SEC, sub-prime mortgages
Friday, April 16, 2010
Regulator sues Goldman Sachs for fraud
From The Hindu
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday announced that it has charged investment bank Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, for “defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages,” even as the U.S. housing market began to collapse.
According to the SEC filing in a U.S. court in the Southern District of New York, the cost of Goldman’s fraudulent activities to investors was more than $1 billion.
In a statement the SEC alleged that when Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) whose value was based on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), it failed to disclose to investors the fact that Paulson and Company – a major hedge fund that had bet against CDO – played a key role in the decision to include that CDO in investors’ portfolios.
The SEC further alleged that Tourre had “devised the transaction, prepared the marketing materials and communicated directly with investors,” knowing fully of Paulson and Company’s short interest in the instruments and its role in the collateral selection process.
Tourre also misled a third-party fund marketing firm into believing that Paulson and Company invested approximately $200 million in a long position on the instrument and, accordingly, that Paulson and Company’s interests in the collateral section process were aligned with the fund marketer’s. In reality Paulson and company’s interests were sharply conflicting.
“The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple,” according to Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement at the SEC.
Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC's Structured and New Products Unit, added that the SEC continued to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the then floundering U.S.. housing market.
In a move that heralds a first major prosecution in the aftermath of the financial markets collapse of 2008 the SEC alleged that Paulson and Company paid Goldman Sachs to structure the transaction such that in which Paulson and Company could “take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson and Company based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.”
In other words Paulson and Company bet that the instrument would lose value and in a bid to maximise its profit from that event it paid Goldman Sachs to get its clients to bet that it would gain in value.
As per the SEC’s charges the marketing materials for the CDO all “represented that the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC, a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS.
The SEC alleged that undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors Paulson and Company played a significant role in selecting which RMBS should make up the portfolio.
According to the SEC's complaint, the deal closed on April 26, 2007, and Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing the instruments. The SEC went on to note that by October 24 2007, 83 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded and 17 percent were on “negative watch”; by January 29 2008, “99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded,” the SEC said.
In the filing the SEC sought “injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.”
Labels: CDO, fraud, Goldman Sachs, mortgages, RMBS, SEC
Subscribe to Comments [Atom]



