Friday, June 03, 2011

 

U.S. not trying to hold China down: Gates

From The Hindu

Taking forward the United States' conciliatory approach towards China, possibly in anticipation of a major fighter aircraft sale to Taiwan later this year, U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates said that his country was “not trying to hold China down.”

Speaking to media on the eve of the Shangri-La talks between the U.S. and East Asian nations, Mr. Gates said China had been a “great power for thousands of years.” He added that China “is a global power and will be a global power.” The Secretary's comments came in the wake of recent moves between the U.S. and China, to bring greater rapprochement to a bilateral relationship that hit a frosty low last year. Following U.S. President Barack Obama's announcement of a major weapons sale to Taiwan in January 2010, Beijing severed all military ties with Washington.

Notwithstanding Mr. Gates' efforts, history could well be on the brink of repeating itself as last week 45 Senators from both sides of the U.S. Congress urged the White House to press forward with the sale of 66 new F-16 C/D fighters to Taiwan.

“Without new fighter aircraft and upgrades to its existing fleet of F-16s, Taiwan will be dangerously exposed to Chinese military threats, aggression and provocation, which pose significant national security implications for the United States,” said the Senators in their letter.

Mr. Gates echoed similar sentiments on the U.S.' interests in Taiwan, however treading a careful line with regards to the implications of this for China. He said while the U.S. did have obligations under the Taiwan Relations Act, under both the Bush and Obama administrations, it had tried to “thread the needle pretty carefully in terms of Taiwan's defensive capabilities, but at the same time being aware of China's sensitivities.”

When the U.S. invited the People's Liberation Army Chief of General Staff Chen Bingde to Washington recently as part of the broader attempt to reset military-to-military relations, the Chinese General was reported to have “renewed his objection to any U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.” Yet even General Bingde sought to water down recent calls in the U.S. for more transparency in Chinese military capabilities, particularly in terms of their focus on Taiwan. Arguing that American claims of Chinese military capabilities are exaggerated, the General said “China's efforts to enhance... military capabilities is mainly targeted at separatist forces ... who have attempted to split Taiwan away from China.”

Labels: , , , ,


Thursday, January 20, 2011

 

Willing to have dialogue on rights: Hu


From The Hindu

Technical problems with simultaneous translations plagued the post-state visit press conference with United States President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao on Wednesday.

Yet the fact that many of the technical snags occurred when Mr. Hu faced questions on China’s human rights record was a fact that left many observers wondering about their timing.

The first set of comments on the thorny bilateral issue of human rights in China, by President Obama, passed through the sound systems unscathed.

Clearly enunciating the U.S. support for human rights and expressing hope that China would do the same, Mr. Obama said that during the state visit, “I reaffirmed America’s fundamental commitment to the universal rights of all people. That includes basic human rights like freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association and demonstration, and of religion – rights that are recognized in the Chinese constitution.”

On the steps forward, he added the U.S. and China had agreed to move ahead with a formal dialogue on human rights and new exchanges to advance the rule of law “while acknowledging there are going to be areas where we disagree.”

He was quick, however, to add that the U.S. recognised that “Tibet is part of the People’s Republic of China, [and] the U.S. continues to support further dialogue between the government of China and the representatives of the Dalai Lama to resolve concerns and differences, including the preservation of the religious and cultural identity of the Tibetan people.”

Yet the reporter to whom Mr. Obama had responded had also asked Mr. Hu about how he would justify China’s record on human rights, and if Mr. Hu thought that was a legitimate concern of the American people – yet no answer was forthcoming from the Chinese President, who instead responded a question from another reporter.

But there was no avoiding the issue when a second reporter reiterated his colleagues question and specifically requested a response from President Hu, who then replied, “First, I would like to clarify, because of the technical translation and interpretation problem, I did not hear the question about the human rights... As you raise this question, and I heard the question properly, certainly I am in a position to answer that question.”

Mr. Hu then explained that in over eight meetings he had held thus far with Mr. Obama, China had not shied away from discussing human rights and its position was that “China recognises and also respects the universality of human rights. And at the same time, we do believe that we also need to take into account the different and national circumstances when it comes to the universal value of human rights.”

However while he stressed that China was a developing country that was currently in a “crucial stage of reform,” and still faced many challenges in economic and social development, he conceded, “And a lot still needs to be done in China, in terms of human rights.”

China was willing to continue to have exchanges and dialogue with other countries in terms of human rights, and we are also willing to learn from each other in terms of the good practices, Mr. Hu said, specifically saying that although there were “disagreements between China and the U.S. on the issue of human rights, China is willing to engage in dialogue and exchanges with the U.S. on the basis of mutual respect and the principle of non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.”

Labels: , , , , , ,


Wednesday, January 19, 2011

 

Tough negotiations ahead for Hu, Obama


From The Hindu

Since he arrived in Washington on Tuesday Chinese President Hu Jintao’s state visit has entirely dominated the attention of the White House’s protocol army. However if recent statements by senior administration officials are anything to go by, official bonhomie may give way to tense negotiations by Wednesday evening, when Mr. Hu will attend a press conference with United States President Barack Obama.

In their opening remarks at the South Lawn of the White House the Chinese President clearly emphasised his hope that his visit would “increase mutual trust, enhance friendship, deepen cooperation, and push forward the positive, cooperative, and comprehensive China-U.S. relationship for the 21st century.”

He added that “China and the U.S. should respect each other’s choice of development path and each other’s core interests,” possibly an oblique reference to China’s interest in Taiwan. Until recently China had suspended all military-to-military ties with the U.S. after the latter sold arms to Taiwan in 2009.

In turn Mr. Obama struck a positive but balanced tone in his remarks saying that, while “The previous 30 years had been a time of estrangement for our two countries... the 30 years since have been a time of growing exchanges and understanding.”

He also hinted at the U.S.’ concerns on human rights in China when he noted, “History shows that societies are more harmonious, nations are more successful, and the world is more just, when the rights and responsibilities of all nations and all people are upheld, including the universal rights of every human being.”

The tenor of Mr. Obama’s comments appeared to jibe with recent comments made by senior officials in his administration who have, in the past few weeks, underscored policy dissonance on thorny economic, social and military issues between the two countries.

Last week U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner reiterated the U.S. view that “a stronger yuan is in China's own best interests, because it would help tame rising inflation that has become a key risk to China's rapid growth,” according to reports. Official anxiety regarding trade imbalances has also grown, focussing in particular on U.S. companies’ lack of access to China’s markets.

Similarly Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in a speech on Friday that China’s human rights record needed to improve, in particular criticising in particular its imprisonment of Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo.

In a similar critical message issued during a meeting with Chinese Minister of National Defence General Liang Guanglie, U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates hinted that the China’s development of a stealth aircraft and its growing assertiveness in the South China Sea were matters of serious concern.

While trade, currency, human rights and military development issues are clearly of much concern in the Obama White House, it may find itself groping for levers to persuade Mr. Hu to make concessions where it matters.

A litmus test of how willing Mr. Hu is to consider please for policy reform will come later on Wednesday when, along with Mr. Obama, he will interact with a group of 18 American and Chinese CEOs and hear their requests for greater market access in China.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, December 02, 2010

 

Not expecting anything good from India: Pak Ambassador

From The Hindu

India was responsible for training and funding extremist groups that were waging a war against the state of Pakistan, Umar Khan Alisherzai, Pakistani Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said during a meeting with his American counterpart least year.

The comments by Mr. Alisherzai were made publicly available by WikiLeaks, the whistleblower website that rocked the United States State Department this week since it began publishing some 250,000 private cables between U.S. diplomats in Washington and across the world.

The cable, dated October 26 2009 and sent from the U.S. embassy in Riyadh to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the U.S. embassy in New Delhi, quoted the Pakistani Ambassador as saying that India had also supported the Taliban in Pakistan, “They (India) will never let a chance to harm Pakistan go.”

The U.S. official recording the conversation went on to note that Mr. Alisherzai summed up his feelings about India by saying, “We are not expecting anything good from them.”

The official also stated in the cable that Mr. Alisherzai had offered some valuable insights into the relationship between intelligence and support provided by the local population in the Federally Administered Tribal Area region and the success of Pakistani military operations.

The U.S. official said that while Mr. Alisherzai’s suggestions on FATA and U.S. strategies to counter the growth of extremism in the region were “worth noting,” his insights on “larger regional issues (such as) Iran, India, and Saudi Arabia appear to be much more limited.”

Elaborating further on what the troubled border region of FATA needed to emerge from its current state of instability Mr. Alisherzai said that investment in education and development was the only way to help the tribal areas, and said that years of “bad luck” had redirected development funds from the tribal areas to the urban population centres.

Labels: , , , ,


Thursday, September 02, 2010

 

U.S. has paid “huge price” in Iraq: Obama


From The Hindu

In an important policy speech that marked the end of the United States' combat operations in Iraq, President Barack Obama said that the "U.S. has paid a huge price" in Iraq and that ending the war was not only in Iraq’s interest but the U.S.’ as well.

Mr. Obama said, "Tonight, I am announcing that the American combat mission in Iraq has ended. Operation Iraqi Freedom is over and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country."

Speaking through a rare televised broadcast from the Oval Office, Mr. Obama emphasised that the end of the combat phase also marked a promise fulfilled by his administration. He said, "This was my pledge to the American people as a candidate for this office."

He said that while the U.S. had by now removed nearly 100,000 U.S. troops from Iraq, a transitional force of 50,000 U.S. troops would remain with the mission of "advising and assisting" especially on targeted counterterrorism missions. Touching on the timeline for total withdrawal, Mr. Obama noted that "all U.S. troops will leave by the end of next year."

Al-Qaeda leadership

President Obama also sought to refocus the spot light on the U.S.’ military engagement in Afghanistan. Referring to the continuing threat of the al-Qaeda leadership, which remained "anchored in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan", Mr. Obama said, "Because of our drawdown in Iraq, we are now able to apply the resources necessary to go on offense."

On the occasion, Mr. Obama recognised the contributions of U.S. armed services in Iraq, noting that at every turn they had served with courage and resolve. “As Commander-in-Chief, I am proud of their service," he said. In particular, he said, the U.S. had sent young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq, and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home. “Now, it is time to turn the page," he argued.

Concern over economy

In a speech that reflected President Obama’s deep concern with the U.S. economy on the eve of the November Congressional elections, Mr. Obama segued from the end of the war in Iraq to the urgent task of putting "the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs back to work".

Admitting that the trillion dollars the U.S. had spent in war, often financed by borrowing from overseas, had "short-changed investments in our own people and contributed to record deficits", Mr. Obama said the U.S. had for too long put off tough decisions on everything from our manufacturing base and energy policy to education reform.

As a result, too many middle-class families were working harder for less, and the U.S.’ long-term competitiveness was at risk, he said.

Labels: , , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Comments [Atom]