Sunday, April 24, 2011
India-U.S. defence meetings kick off
From The Hindu
In the backdrop of the approaching United States-India Strategic Dialogue meetings in New Delhi this spring, the 11th U.S.-India Defence Policy Group (DPG) met in Washington during March 3-4 for extensive discussion on strengthening bilateral defence ties, particularly in the areas of maritime security, counterterrorism, disaster relief, and personnel exchanges.
According to officials at the Indian embassy here the meetings were co-chaired by Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Defence Secretary, Government of India and Michelle Flournoy, Under Secretary of Defence for Policy. Officials said that Mr. Kumar also met William Burns, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs and William Lynn, Deputy Secretary of Defence.
Reaffirming that the bilateral defence cooperation was an “important facet of the overall India-U.S. strategic partnership,” Mr. Kumar and Ms. Flournoy expressed satisfaction at the progress in this area, noting in particular the increasing number of joint exercises that the two armed forces held regularly. Additionally India’s procurement of defence equipment such as C-130J aircraft was an important aspect of this progress, officials said.
In a statement Indian embassy also said that both sides had “welcomed the removal of Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and Bharat Dynamics Limited from the U.S. Entities List,” especially as this relaxation of restrictions would likely open up new opportunities for cooperation in the field of defence supplies and industrial and technological cooperation between the two countries more generally.
During the meetings the reports of four sub-groups of the DPG were reviewed and a policy-level dialogue was held on the global strategic and security situation.
On broader regional themes both sides touched upon the multilateral security architecture in Asia and looked forward to continued cooperation in regional organisations, officials said, explaining that the two sides had agreed that the next DPG meetings would be held in New Delhi early next year.
Labels: bilateral defence ties, India, Indo-U.S. ties, international relations, military cooperation, U.S.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Tough negotiations ahead for Hu, Obama
From The Hindu
Since he arrived in Washington on Tuesday Chinese President Hu Jintao’s state visit has entirely dominated the attention of the White House’s protocol army. However if recent statements by senior administration officials are anything to go by, official bonhomie may give way to tense negotiations by Wednesday evening, when Mr. Hu will attend a press conference with United States President Barack Obama.
In their opening remarks at the South Lawn of the White House the Chinese President clearly emphasised his hope that his visit would “increase mutual trust, enhance friendship, deepen cooperation, and push forward the positive, cooperative, and comprehensive China-U.S. relationship for the 21st century.”
He added that “China and the U.S. should respect each other’s choice of development path and each other’s core interests,” possibly an oblique reference to China’s interest in Taiwan. Until recently China had suspended all military-to-military ties with the U.S. after the latter sold arms to Taiwan in 2009.
In turn Mr. Obama struck a positive but balanced tone in his remarks saying that, while “The previous 30 years had been a time of estrangement for our two countries... the 30 years since have been a time of growing exchanges and understanding.”
He also hinted at the U.S.’ concerns on human rights in China when he noted, “History shows that societies are more harmonious, nations are more successful, and the world is more just, when the rights and responsibilities of all nations and all people are upheld, including the universal rights of every human being.”
The tenor of Mr. Obama’s comments appeared to jibe with recent comments made by senior officials in his administration who have, in the past few weeks, underscored policy dissonance on thorny economic, social and military issues between the two countries.
Last week U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner reiterated the U.S. view that “a stronger yuan is in China's own best interests, because it would help tame rising inflation that has become a key risk to China's rapid growth,” according to reports. Official anxiety regarding trade imbalances has also grown, focussing in particular on U.S. companies’ lack of access to China’s markets.
Similarly Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in a speech on Friday that China’s human rights record needed to improve, in particular criticising in particular its imprisonment of Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo.
In a similar critical message issued during a meeting with Chinese Minister of National Defence General Liang Guanglie, U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates hinted that the China’s development of a stealth aircraft and its growing assertiveness in the South China Sea were matters of serious concern.
While trade, currency, human rights and military development issues are clearly of much concern in the Obama White House, it may find itself groping for levers to persuade Mr. Hu to make concessions where it matters.
A litmus test of how willing Mr. Hu is to consider please for policy reform will come later on Wednesday when, along with Mr. Obama, he will interact with a group of 18 American and Chinese CEOs and hear their requests for greater market access in China.
Labels: bilateral ties, China, China President, Hu Jintao, international relations, President Barack Obama, U.S., U.S.-China relations
Thursday, December 02, 2010
U.S. plea to China on N. Korea
From The Hindu
The United States expects China to wield its influence over North Korea, said a senior State Department official, after an exchange of artillery fire between North and South Korea on Tuesday. During a media briefing, Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs P.J. Crowley said: “China is pivotal to moving North Korea in a fundamentally different direction,” adding that while it was up to North Korea to stop provocative acts, the U.S. believed that China had influence with North Korea.
He said, “We don't want to understate or overstate that [influence that China has]. It is not that China can dictate a particular action to North Korea, but it is that China, together with the U.S. and other countries, have to send a clear, direct, unified message that it is North Korea that has to change.”
The incident on the fringes of the Yellow Sea elicited reactions across the board within the U.S government with the White House saying, “The U.S. strongly condemns this attack and calls on North Korea to halt its belligerent action and to fully abide by the terms of the Armistice Agreement.”
Navy Admiral Mike Mullen said while Americans should be concerned about North Korea's “volatile posture,” the U.S. had 28,000 troops in South Korea, where “we are very much aligned with in supporting them”.
According to the American Forces Press Service, the USS George Washington aircraft carrier will join South Korean naval forces in the Yellow Sea west of the peninsula to conduct enhanced military exercises from November 28 to December 1.
To a question on why the U.S. expected China reaction to be any different to its statements on the sinking of South Korea's Cheonan ship earlier this year, Mr. Crowley said the U.S. had held discussions with China both in Beijing and in Washington and they expected high-level conversations with China to continue in the coming days.
Reiterating the U.S.' keenness to see a stronger Chinese reaction, however, he added, “So this is something that we feel strongly about, and we will be communicating that. We have already communicated that to China. We will continue to encourage China to send a direct message to North Korea.”
Touching on the specific steps that the U.S. expected to see from China, Mr. Crowley said “We would hope and expect that China will use [its] influence first to reduce tensions that have arisen as a result of North Korean provocations, and then secondly, continue to encourage North Korea to take affirmative steps to denuclearise.”
Labels: international relations, Korean row, North Korean attack
Subscribe to Comments [Atom]




